Ruffa v. McDaniel et al
| 2:2009cv02258 |
| November 25, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Habeas Corpus (General) Office |
| Kent J. Dawson |
| Peggy A. Leen |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
ORDER that 35 Motion to Appoint Counsel is DENIED strictly as a motion for district court consideration and without prejudice to petitioner's pending presentation of the motion to the Court of Appeals. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 1/9/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER that 2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Rose v. Lundy, 455 U.S. 509 (1982). FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner is DENIED a Certificate of Appealability. FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk shall enter JUDGMENT accordingly. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 10/31/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER that petitioner shall have 30 days from the date of entry of this order within which to file a notice of abandonment of unexhausted claims, indicating that ground one and ground fourt are to be deleted from his petition. FURTHER ORDERED that, if petitioner does not abandon his unexhausted claims within the time allowed, the petition shall be dismissed. If petitioner abandons his unexhausted claims within the time allowed, respondents shall have 45 days from the date the notice of abandonm ent is filed within which to answer the remaining ground in the petition. Petitioner shall have 45 days after service of the answer to file and serve a reply. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 5/23/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
26
IT IS ORDERED that 23 Motion for Discovery is Denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED 10 Motion to Dismiss the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is Granted in part and Denied in part . IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner shall have thirty (30) days from the date of entry of this order to show good cause for his failure to exhaust his unexhausted claims in state court, and to present argument regarding the question whether or not his unexhausted claims are plainly meritless. Respondents shall thereafter have twenty (20) days to respond. Petitioner shall thereafter have fifteen (15) days to reply. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 11/10/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DXS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ruffa v. McDaniel et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
