United States of America v. $9,088.28 in United States Currency et al
| United States of America |
| $2,400.00 in United States Currency, $5,884.68 in United States Currency, $5,891.45 in United States Currency, $64,361.89 in United States Currency and $9,088.28 in United States Currency |
| 2:2010cv00727 |
| May 18, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Philip M. Pro |
| Forfeit/Penalty: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
ORDER Granting 15 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by United States of America. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 5/16/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER Granting an Extension to File a Civil Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem. Complaint deadline: 4/17/12. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 12/20/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER Granting 12 Unopposed Motion for an Extension to File a Civil Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem. Complaint deadline: 4/17/2012. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 12/14/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER Granting 5 Unopposed Motion to Extend Time for the United States to file a civil complaint for forfeiture in rem to 2/22/11. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leavitt on 11/18/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
