Bottzeck et al v. Las Vegas Metro Police Department et al
Plaintiff: Anthony P. Bottzeck, Peter Jeff Bottzeck and Astrid Mangubat
Defendant: Las Vegas Metro Police Department and Leija
Case Number: 2:2010cv01093
Filed: July 2, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Roger L. Hunt
Presiding Judge: Peggy A. Leen
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 25, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER that Magistrate Judge Leens Report of Findings and Recommendation 25 entered 10/7/2011 is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED, and the case is DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Roger L. Hunt on 10/25/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
July 21, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER GRANTING 16 and 17 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Clerk of the Court shall File the Complaint and issue summons to Defendant Leija and deliver the same to the U.S. Marshal. Plaintiffs' official capac ity claim against Defendant Leija is DISMISSED. Plaintiffs' claim against Defendant LVMPD is DISMISSED. Plaintiffs' claim against Defendant City of Las Vegas is DISMISSED. Plaintiff Anthony Bottzeck's claims for n egligent infliction of emotional distress and intentional infliction of emotional distress are DISMISSED. Clerk shall send Plaintiffs a blank section 1983 civil rights complaint form with instruction along with one copy of the original complaint. 18 Motion to Appoint Guardian ad Litem is DENIED. Amended Complaint deadline: 8/22/2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 7/21/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
April 6, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER - Clerk of Court shall mail Plaintiffs two blank applications to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Plaintiffs shall each file separate Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by 4/25/2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 4/5/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
February 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER that the Request for Hearing 12 is DENIED. The Motion to Reopen our Police Misconduct Case 11 is GRANTED, and the Court rescinds its order dismissing the case and directs the Clerks office to reopen the case. Plaintiffs have twenty-one (21 ) days from the date of this Order to file an Amended Complaint which either removes Peter Jeff Bottzeck as a Plaintiff, or states a claim on his behalf. All Plaintiffs (except Peter Jeff Bottzeck if he is dropped from the case) shall, within twenty -one (21) days from the date of this Order, file with the Court new and separate applications to proceed in forma pauperis. If Plaintiffs fail to abide by any of the above orders, the case will be dismissed with finality. Signed by Chief Judge Roger L. Hunt on 2/14/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
January 18, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER Accepting and Adopting Report and Recommendations to Dismiss Complaint. Signed by Chief Judge Roger L. Hunt on 1/18/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
December 8, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER and REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall file the Plaintiffs' Complaint. IT IS RECOMMENDED that the Complaint be DISMISSED unless Plaintiffs file separate Applications to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with signed financial certificates on or before 12/21/10. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 12/3/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
October 8, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER for the Filing of Separate Applications to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. Applications to Proceed in Forma Pauperis or Payment of filing fees due 11/7/2010. Blank IFP Applications and Instructions mailed to each plaintiff. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 10/7/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bottzeck et al v. Las Vegas Metro Police Department et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anthony P. Bottzeck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Peter Jeff Bottzeck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Astrid Mangubat
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Las Vegas Metro Police Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Leija
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?