Lefever v. Gutheridge et al
Plaintiff: Franklin Carl Lefever
Defendant: Scott Gutheridge, Nicholson and Danita Rounsvill
Case Number: 2:2010cv01917
Filed: November 2, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Roger L. Hunt
Presiding Judge: Peggy A. Leen
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 14, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER Denying 44 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment; Granting 48 Plaintiff's Motion to Withdraw Motion to Extend Time; and Denying 46 Plaintiff's Motion to Extend Time. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 03/14/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)
November 5, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER Denying 40 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 11/5/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
November 16, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER Granting 25 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 11/15/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
October 7, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER Granting 20 Motion to Extension of Scheduling Order and 24 Motion to Withdraw 23 Response to Motion. Discovery due by 4/2/2012. Motions due by 5/2/2012. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 6/1/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 10/5/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
May 16, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER Denying 13 Motion for Entry of Clerks Default and Denying 14 Motion to Compel. Signed by Judge Roger L. Hunt on 5/11/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
January 10, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER granting 1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Clerk of Court to file Complaint. Count III is DISMISSED. Count I may PROCEED. Count II is DISMISSED with leave to amend. Plaintiff has 30 days to file Amended Complaint. Signed by Chief Judge Roger L. Hunt on 1/10/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS, cc: forms to plaintiff)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lefever v. Gutheridge et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Scott Gutheridge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nicholson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Danita Rounsvill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Franklin Carl Lefever
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?