Serecky v. Smith et al
| Ida Michelle Serecky |
| United States Postal Service and Denise Smith |
| Rimantas A. Rukstele |
| 2:2011cv00124 |
| January 24, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Roger L. Hunt |
| Lawrence R. Leavitt |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle ( |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
ORDER that the settlement conference shall be rescheduled for July 10, 2012 at 9:30 a.m. in chambers of the undersigned Judge and the confidential statement shall be due on or before 4:00 p.m., July 3, 2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 5/2/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
|
|
Filing
26
Stipulated PROTECTIVE ORDER Regarding Personnel File of Denise Smith. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 3/26/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDERED that Denise Smith and United States Postal Service are dismissed from this action on the grounds that the exclusive remedy for such claim is an action against the United States. The caption of this action shall be amended to reflect the substitution of the United States of America as the sole Federal Defendant. Signed by Judge Roger L. Hunt on 9/7/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
