Turner v. Nozero et al
Plaintiff: Annette L. Turner
Defendant: U.S. Air Force Base Commander, U.S Nellis A.F. Base, Elizabeth Nozero, Power Services, Carl Sutton, Amy Cardirol and 99 Communication Squadron
Case Number: 2:2011cv00190
Filed: February 3, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Peggy A. Leen
Presiding Judge: Philip M. Pro
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 3, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER Granting 35 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 7/3/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
June 8, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER that Defendants Motion to Extend Time to File ENE Statement and to Vacate the ENE Until After the Court Rules on the Motion to Dismiss 34 is granted. The ENE conference scheduled for June 15, 2012 is vacated. Upon ruling on Defendants Motion to Dismiss 35 the Court will re-schedule the ENE conference if necessary. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 6/8/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
May 3, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER that Defendant Power Services Motion to Dismiss 21 is hereby GRANTED and Plaintiff Annette L. Turners Complaint 9 is hereby DISMISSED with leave to amend. Plaintiff Annette L. Turner shall have until June 1, 2012, to file an Amended Complaint if she believes she can correct the noted deficiencies. Failure to comply with this Order will result in dismissal of this case, with prejudice. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 5/3/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
February 27, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER that Plaintiffs Motion for More Time 24 is DENIED. Plaintiff shall have to and including March 12, 2012 within which to file her response in opposition to Defendants Motion to Dismiss (21]. Failure to do so will result in Court granting Defendants Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 2/27/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
December 19, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER Granting 16 Motion to Have Power Services Re-Served. The Clerk shall deliver a Summons directed to Power Services, Plaintiff's Complaint, and a copy of 8 the Screening Order to the USMS. Clerk shall provide plaintiff with a form USM-2 85. Plaintiff shall have 20 days to furnish the USM with the required form USM-285. Plaintiff shall have until 2/21/12 in which to serve Defendant Power Services. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 12/19/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF; USM 285 to plaintiff - MMM)
September 16, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDERED that the Clerk shall provide plaintiff with another form USM-285. Plaintiff shall have 20 days in which to furnish the US Marshal with the required form USM-285. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 9/15/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF; blank USM285 to Plaintiff - MMM)
April 4, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDERED Granting 7 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Clerk shall file the complaint. Clerk shall issue Summons to Defendant Power Services. Plaintiff shall have twenty days to furnish the USM with required form USM-285. Plaintiff must file a notice with the court identifying whether defendant was served within twenty days of receiving the USM-285 back from the US Marshal. Plaintiff's claim under Title VII for discrimination is DISMISSED, with leave to amend. Plaintiff&# 039;s claim under 42 USC 1983 is DISMISSED, with leave to amend. Plaintiff's Title VII claims against defendants Carl Sutton, Amy Cardirol, or Elizabeth Nozero are DISMISSED, with leave to amend. Plaintiff's claims against 99 Communication Squadron and Nellis A.F. Base are DISMISSED, with leave to amend. Plaintiff's claims against U.S. Air Force Base Commander and Security Officers are DISMISSED, with leave to amend. Plaintiff shall have until 4/28/11 to file her Amended Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 3/28/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF; blank USM-285 to Plaintiff with copy of complaint - MMM)
March 16, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER Denying Without Prejudice 4 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Clerk shall mail Plaintiff a blank Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Plaintiff shall complete the Application and file it not later than 4/15/11. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 3/14/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF; blank ifp form to plaintiff - MMM)
February 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER Denying without Prejudice 1 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Clerk to mail Plaintiff a blank Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis form for non-incarcerated litigants. Plaintiff shall complete the Application and file it no later than 3/15/2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 2/14/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Turner v. Nozero et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. Air Force Base Commander
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S Nellis A.F. Base
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Elizabeth Nozero
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Power Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carl Sutton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Amy Cardirol
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 99 Communication Squadron
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Annette L. Turner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?