Davis v. Clark County, et al
| James Anthony Davis |
| Frank Johan Coumou, Clark County, Nevada, Fox 5 News, Glenn Puitt and John Huck |
| 2:2011cv00231 |
| February 10, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Peggy A. Leen |
| Philip M. Pro |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
4
ORDER that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to comply with the courts order to pay the filing fee. Plaintiffs motion for leave to file exhibit A under seal 2 is DENIED as moot. Clerk to enter Judgment. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 3/31/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER that plaintiffs application to proceed in forma pauperis 1 is DENIED. This entire action will be dismissed without prejudice unless plaintiff pays the $350.00 filing fee in full within thirty (30) days of entry of this order. The Clerk of Court shall send plaintiff two copies of this order. Plaintiff shall make the necessary arrangements to have one copy of this order attached to the check paying the filing fee. The Clerk of the Court shall retain the complaint. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 2/15/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS, 2 copies of order to plaintiff)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
