Froby v. Clark County School District et al
Margaret Froby |
State of Nevada and Clark County School District |
2:2012cv01789 |
October 11, 2012 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Larry R. Hicks |
Peggy A. Leen |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex) |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 48 ORDER Granting Defendant Clark County School District's 45 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in favor of Defendant Clark County School District and against Plaintiff Margaret Froby in this action. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 8/25/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD) |
Filing 30 ORDER Granting 27 Motion to Dismiss. This action, is DISMISSED in its entirety with prejudice. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 7/22/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR) |
Filing 23 ORDER Granting 15 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiffs 1 complaint is DISMISSED in its entirety. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Margaret Froby shall have 30 days from entry of this order to file an amended complaint. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 05/13/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC) |
Filing 22 ORDER Granting 21 Motion to Voluntary Dismiss Defendant Nevada Department of Corrections. Denying 9 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 3/19/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.