Ramirez v. Colvin
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|June 23, 2015
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Koppe, 26 , be, and the same hereby are, ADOPTED in their entirety. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs motion to remand, 19 , be, and the same hereby is, DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants cross-motion to affirm, 23 , be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED. The clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close the case. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 6/23/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
|March 31, 2015
ORDER granting 27 Unopposed Motion to extend objection to report and recommendation deadline. Objections to R&R due by 4/26/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 3/31/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DKJ)
|July 22, 2013
ORDER Denying without Prejudice 1 Plaintiff's Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk of Court shall mail Plaintiff a blank application and Plaintiff shall have until 8/21/2013 in which to submit the completed application or pay the $350.00 filing fee. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation to the district judge for dismissal.The Clerk of Court shall retain Plaintiff's Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 7/22/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - forms mailed to Plaintiff's counsel - SLD)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?