Bagley v. Beville et al
David M. Bagley |
Todd B. Parriott, Thomas L. Gustafson, Bryan L. Goolsby, James L. George, G. Steven Dawson, Robert M. Beville and Charles W. Wolcott |
Desert Capital Reit, Inc. |
U.S. Trustee |
2:2013cv01119 |
June 21, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Carl W. Hoffman |
James C. Mahan |
Bankruptcy Withdrawl |
28 U.S.C. ยง 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 104 ORDER Granting Defendants' 101 and 102 Motions to Dismiss. Count II of Plaintiff's Complaint is Dismissed as to all Defendants. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 7/10/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD) |
Filing 97 ORDER Granting 94 Motion to Partially Dismiss with prejudice. IT IS ORDERED that the Trustee's claims for aiding and abetting breaches of fiduciary duty against Goolsby, previously dismissed without prejudice by Order dated December 26, 2013 32 , are hereby dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 4/14/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS) |
Filing 96 ORDER that 68 Motion to Amend is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff file an amended complaint in accordance with the foregoing within twenty-one (21) days of the entry of this order. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 4/11/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Filing 95 ORDER Denying 69 Motion to Certify Order for Interlocutory Appeal and Denying 70 Motion to Certify Issues of Law to the Nevada Supreme Court. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 4/8/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD) |
Filing 81 ORDER that sanctions, including monetary sanctions and a recommendation for civil contempt, shall not be imposed on Attorney Ambrush S. Sidhu. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 01/30/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC) |
Filing 67 ORDER Granting in part and Denying in part parties' 66 Joint Unopposed Motion to Modify the Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 12/11/2014. Motions due by 1/9/2015. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 2/9/2015. All coun sel of record shall submit a notice to the court by 1/27/2014 certifying that they have reviewed the corrections listed in this order in addition to the following Local Rules: LR 26-1 and LR 26-4. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 1/17/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD) |
Filing 65 ORDER Granting 32 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that aspects of plaintiffs claims for breach of fiduciary duty (count one) and waste and mismanagement (count three) involving acts which took place prior to April 29, 2008 or after May 7, 2010, are DISMISSED with prejudice as to defendant G. Steven Dawson. Plaintiffs claim for aiding and abetting breaches of fiduciary duty (count two) is DISMISSED without prejudice as to defendant Dawson. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 01/02/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC) |
Filing 62 ORDER Granting 31 Defendant Bryan L. Goolsby's Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 12/26/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Filing 25 ORDER Granting 1 Motion to Withdraw Reference. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 7/18/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.