Tagle v. Neven et al
Petitioner: Victor Tagle
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Nevada and D.W. Neven
Case Number: 2:2013cv01832
Filed: October 7, 2013
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Carl W. Hoffman
Presiding Judge: James C. Mahan
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 17, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 59 MINUTE ORDER denying as moot 58 motion for case information. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JRB)
May 19, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 56 ORDER Granting 40 Motion to Dismiss. This Action is Dismissed. The Clerk of Court Shall Enter Judgment Accordingly. It Is Further Ordered that a Certificate of Appealability Shall Not Issue. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 5/19/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DC)
March 18, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 55 ORDER Denying 33 , 35 , 36 , 38 , 48 , and 50 Motions. It Is Further Ordered that 45 Motion to Seal and 46 Motion to Extend Time are Granted. Clerk of Court Shall Seal Respondents' Exhibit 19, Currently in the Docket at 41 -19. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 3/18/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DC)
July 16, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER Denying 18 Motion to be Removed from NDOC's Facility/Jurisdiction. Denying as moot 25 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Denying 27 Motion to extend prison copywork limit. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 7/16/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
July 9, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER Granting 21 Motion to Extend Time to reply to 18 Emergency motion for petitioners release. Replies due by 7/21/2014. Denying 22 Motion for court appearance. Denying 23 Motion to extend prison copywork limit. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 7/9/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
June 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER Denying 2 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Paragraph 14 and the two subsequent paragraphs of ground 1 of the 1 petition are DISMISSED. Grounds 2 and 3 of the petition are DISMISSED. Denying 9 , 12 , and 14 Motions to remove the lifetime supervision. Denying 10 , 11 , and 13 Motions to Appoint Counsel. Answer due within 45 days. Reply is due 45 days on which the answer is served. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 6/3/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF; CC: AG, Petitioner with required copies - SLR)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tagle v. Neven et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: D.W. Neven
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Victor Tagle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?