Peters v. Neven et al
Wilson O. Peters |
Attorney General State of Nevada and Dwight Neven |
2:2014cv01055 |
June 30, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Cam Ferenbach |
Andrew P. Gordon |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 53 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 8 petitioner's amended petition is DENIED in its entirety. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall enter judgment and close this case. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 7/18/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
Filing 52 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 46 respondents' motion to strike is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 41 petitioner's motion for leave to file exhibits under seal is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 8/22/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
Filing 39 ORDER that 38 Motion to Extend Time to Reply re 37 Answer to Habeas Petition is GRANTED. Replies due by 9/28/2016. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 7/22/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Filing 34 ORDER. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that 22 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED in part: ground 1(B) is DISMISSED as set forth in this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents shall file an answer to petitioner's remaining grounds for relief within 45 days of the date of this order. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 2/29/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR) |
Filing 19 ORDER. IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that respondents second motion for extension of time 17 is GRANTED. Respondents shall file and serve their response to the amended petition 8 on or before July 22, 2015. IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that respondents first motion for extension of time 16 is GRANTED nunc pro tunc. IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that petitioners pro se motion to stay 18 isSTRICKEN. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 6/30/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR) . |
Filing 15 ORDER granting 13 Motion to Seal. Respondents shall file a response to the amended petition 8 , including potentially by motion to dismiss, within ninety (90) days of the date of this order, with any requests for relief by petitioner by motion otherwise being subject to the normal briefing schedule under the local rules. Any response filed shall comply with the remaining provisions below, which are entered pursuant to Habeas Rule 4. Petitioner shall have thirty (30) days from service of the answer, motion to dismiss, or other response to file a reply or opposition, with any other requests for relief by respondents by motion otherwise being subject to the normal briefing schedule under the local rules. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 1/16/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DKJ) |
Filing 4 ORDER Granting 1 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis.The Clerk of Court shall file the Petition. Granting 3 Motion to Appoint Counsel. The Federal Public Defender shall be provisionally appointed as counsel and shall have 30 days to undertake direct representation of petitioner or to indicate an inability to do so. Respondents' counsel shall enter a notice of appearance within 21 days. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 7/1/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF; CC: FPD, CJA, AG - SLR) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.