Odiaga v. D.W. Neven et al
| Victor Odiaga |
| Attorney General State of Nevada and D.W. Neven |
| 2:2014cv01251 |
| July 29, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Jennifer A. Dorsey |
| Nancy J. Koppe |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
ORDER that 6 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED on the merits, and this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment, in favor of respondents and against Odiaga, dismissing this action with prejudice. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 8/8/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER that 8 and 9 MOTIONS to Extend Deadline to Respond re 6 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus are GRANTED nunc pro tunc to March 23, 2015. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 4/20/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER that 1 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. Petitioner shall have 30 days from entry of this order to have the filing fee of five dollars ($5.00) sent to the Clerk of Court. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 8/4/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF: 2 copies to petitioner - MMM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
