Harden v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
Plaintiff: Harold D. Harden
Defendant: T. Filson, High Desert State Prison, Nevada Department of Corrections and Dwight Neven
Case Number: 2:2014cv02008
Filed: December 2, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Jennifer A. Dorsey
Presiding Judge: Cam Ferenbach
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 1, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 146 ORDER Temporarily Unsealing Audio Recording. The audio recording shall thereafter be resealed and a certified copy of transcript be delivered to the Clerk and remain sealed until further order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 5/1/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF, cc: Transcriber - JM)
March 9, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 137 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 128 Harden's motion to alter final judgment granting summary judgment for defendant is DENIED, and 136 Harden's motion for leave to resubmit is GRANTED. This case remains closed. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 3/9/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
January 9, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 126 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that 99 defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED and all other pending motions 97 , 104 , 105 , 110 , 113 , 114 , 115 , 117 , 118 are DENIED as moot. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment for defendants and against Harden and CLOSE THIS CASE. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 1/9/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
December 6, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 111 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 83 , 85 , 103 Harden's motions for leave to file are DENIED.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 84 Harden's Motion to Compel is DENIED.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 86 Harden's Motion to Reconsider is GRANTED. Upon reconsideration, Harden's prior motions for leave to file 77 , 81 are DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 89 Harden's Motion for Discovery Sanctions is DENIED.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 95 Harden's Motion to Extend Time is DENIED.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 96 Harden's Motion for a Copy of Order 93 is GRANTED. The clerk of the court is instructed to provide Harden with a copy of the most recent docket sheet. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 12/6/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
November 16, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 98 ORDER DENYING 47 , 71 , 73 and 74 Motions. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 11/16/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DC)
September 12, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 82 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 77 81 Harden's motions for leave to file supporting affidavits and are DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 9/12/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
July 29, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 72 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's 60 Motion for Sanctions is Denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's 67 Motion to Strike the Answer is Denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 07/29/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV)
July 21, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 70 ORDER DENYING 57 Motion to Appoint Counsel and 59 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 7/21/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
April 4, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER that Plaintiff's 39 Objection is DENIED. Plaintiff's 40 Motion for More Definite Statement is DENIED as moot. Plaintiff's 1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. Plaintiff is not requir ed to pay an initial installment of the filing fee. In the event that this action is dismissed, the full filing fee must still be paid. The Clerk of the Court is to electronically serve a copy of this Order and a copy of Plaintiff's 7 Amen ded Complaint on the Office of the Attorney General of the State of Nevada, attention Kat Howe. The Attorney General's Office must file a notice advising the Court and Plaintiff re names of the Defendants it does/does not accept service for. I f the Attorney General accepts service of process for any named Defendant(s), those Defendants must file and serve an Answer or other response to the Complaint by 6/4/2016. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 4/4/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - cc: Finance Dept, Chief of Inmate Services - SLD)
February 16, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's 33 Motion to Alter or Amend to Replace "John Doe Defendant" with his true name of Lt. Christopher Day. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's 34 Motion to Alter or Amend First Amendment Claim is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's 37 Motion to Stay is GRANTED. The stay is extended through 4/1/16 and Defendants' updated status report is due on that date. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 2/16/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS)
February 4, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the Stay is extended until Friday, 3/18/16. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Attorney General's Office shall file an updated status report on or before Friday, 3/18/16. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 2/4/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS)
November 5, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Harold Harden's 13 Motion for Reconsideration and 12 Motion for Appointment of Counsel are DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that his 20 Motion for Notification is DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 11/5/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS)
May 18, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER denying without prejudice 8 Motion for District Judge to Reconsider Order. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 5/18/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DKJ)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harden v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: T. Filson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: High Desert State Prison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nevada Department of Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dwight Neven
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Harold D. Harden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?