Bird v. Nevada Highway Patrol et al
| David Bird |
| Nevada Highway Patrol, M. Trooper Lecko, M Trooper May, Trooper Pedraza and Trooper White |
| 2:2014cv02114 |
| December 12, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Jennifer A. Dorsey |
| Carl W. Hoffman |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
7
ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 9/27/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD) Modified to include text without prejudice on 9/27/2017 (SLD).
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER that the Magistrate Judge's 2 Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED. Bird's claims against defendant Shari Kaufman are DISMISSED with prejudice and without leave to amend. Bird's claims against defendants Nevada Highway Pa trol and Troopers May, White, Pedraza, Lecko, and Mendoza are DISMISSED without prejudice and with leave to amend.Bird has until 2/23/2017 to file an amended complaint. If Bird does not file an amended complaint by this deadline, this action will be dismissed without prejudice and closed without further notice. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 2/9/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
