Fidelis Holdings, LLC et al v. Hand
Fidelis Holdings Henderson, LLC, Fidelis Holdings Las Vegas, LLC and Fidelis Holdings, LLC |
Learned J. Hand |
2:2015cv00147 |
January 26, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Nancy J. Koppe |
Gloria M. Navarro |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 67 JUDGMENT on Attorney Fees in favor of Learned J. Hand against Fidelis Holdings Henderson, LLC, Fidelis Holdings Las Vegas, LLC, Fidelis Holdings, LLC. Signed by Clerk of Court Debra K. Kempi on 1/26/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM) |
Filing 66 ORDER REGARDING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS Accepting 65 Report and Recommendation and Granting in Part and Denying in Part 58 Motion for Attorney Fees (See Order for Details). Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 1/25/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM) |
Filing 55 ORDER that 38 Amended Complaint is dismissed with prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED that 46 Motion to Dismiss and 49 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment are DENIED as moot. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly and thereafter close this case. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 5/2/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Filing 45 ORDER Granting 44 Stipulation to Withdraw Motion for Protective Order. It Is Further Ordered that 40 Motion for Protective Order is Denied as Moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 9/15/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DC) |
Filing 41 ORDER re 40 Emergency Motion for Protective Order. As an initial matter, the Court ORDERS counsel to continue their meet-and-confer efforts and, more particularly, to conduct an in-person or telephonic meet-and-confer to further discuss the disput e by 5:00 p.m. today, September 14, 2015. In the event counsel resolve the dispute, Plaintiffs shall promptly file a notice that they are withdrawing the pending motion for protective order. In the event counsel do not resolve the dispute, any response to the motion for protective order must be filed no later than noon on September 15, 2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 9/14/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Filing 37 ORDER that 12 Motion to Stay or Dismiss pursuant ot the Colorado River doctrine is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that 14 Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. FURTHER ORD ERED that Plaintiffs shall have twenty-one (21) days from the date of this Order to file an amended complaint to correct the deficiencies relating to their abuse of process claim. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 8/19/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Filing 35 ORDER Granting 34 Stipulation to Extend Discovery Schedule. Discovery due by 10/7/2015. Motions due by 11/3/2015. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 12/4/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 7/2/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DC) |
Filing 33 ORDER re 31 Stipulation for Protective Order. IT IS ORDERED that counsel shall comply with the requirements of Local Rule 10-5(b), the Ninth Circuits decision in Kamakana, 447 F.3d 1172, and the procedures outlined above, with respect to any documents filed under seal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 6/16/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DC) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.