Smith v. Las Vegas Metro Police Department et al
Phillip E. Smith |
City of Las Vegas and Las Vegas Metro Police Department |
2:2015cv01011 |
June 1, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Peggy A. Leen |
James C. Mahan |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 57 ORDER that 46 Motion for Time Extension is DENIED as moot. FURTHER ORDERED that 48 Motion to Appoint Counsel is DENIED as moot. FURTHER ORDERED that 49 Motion for Court Order for Exhibits is DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 10/18/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Filing 52 ORDER re 51 Referral Notice from the Ninth Circuit. ORDERED that plaintiff's in forma pauperis status be, and the same hereby is, REVOKED. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 3/22/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF: cc Ninth Circuit - MMM) |
Filing 43 ORDER that 15 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED without prejudice. The clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close the case. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 2/14/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Filing 31 ORDER that Plaintiff Phillip E. Smith's Motions for Appointment of Counsel (ECF Nos. 19 , 27 ) and Motion for Court Order for Exhibits (ECF No. 20 , 28 ) are DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 10/26/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.