Schwartzer v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.
Plaintiff: Lenard E. Schwartzer
Defendant: American Family Mutual Insurance Co.
Case Number: 2:2015cv01115
Filed: June 11, 2015
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Andrew P. Gordon
Presiding Judge: Peggy A. Leen
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 12, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 69 ORDER Granting 68 Stipulation of Dismissal with prejudice. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 10/12/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
March 9, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 58 ORDER Granting 56 Stipulation for Extension of Time (First Request) to File Joint Pretrial Order. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 3/9/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
December 28, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 55 ORDER Rejecting 54 Proposed Pretrial Order. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 1/27/2017. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 12/28/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
November 9, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER that the parties shall file a proposed joint pretrial order that complies with the Local Rules on or before November 30, 2016. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 11/9/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
March 25, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER Granting 45 Stipulation 37 Motion to Strike. Motion Hearing reset for 4/18/2016 09:00 AM in LV Courtroom 3B before Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 3/25/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
December 9, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall comply with LR 10-5(b), the Ninth Circuit's opinion in Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006), and the CM/ECF filing instructions stated herein with respect to filing documents under seal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 12/7/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
December 7, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 17 Agreed Protective Order Granting 16 Stipulation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 12/7/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
October 27, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER Denying 12 Amended Stipulated Discovery Plan and Proposed Scheduling Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 10/26/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Schwartzer v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: American Family Mutual Insurance Co.
Represented By: Paul A. Acker
Represented By: Troy A Clark
Represented By: Nelson L. Cohen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lenard E. Schwartzer
Represented By: Mark L. Jackson
Represented By: Robert D. Vannah
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?