PNC Bank, National Association v. Mao and Zhang LV LLC
Plaintiff: PNC Bank, National Association
Defendant: Mao and Zhang LV LLC
Case Number: 2:2015cv01164
Filed: June 19, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Kent J. Dawson
Presiding Judge: Cam Ferenbach
Nature of Suit: Real Property: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition to Quiet Title
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 46 Order Granting 45 Amended Stipulation re Release of Deed of Trust and Dismissal with prejudice. The claims and counterclaims between PNC Bank, National Association and Mao and Zhang LV LLC are Dismissed with prejudice. This stipulation shall not disturb the claims brought by Mao and Zhang LV LLC against any other party. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 10/25/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
October 22, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER that the STAY is LIFTED. Mao and Zhang shall file proof of service of the summons and complaint on remaining counter-defendants within 14 days of the entry of this order. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 10/22/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
April 18, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER that the Status Hearing set for 4/24/2017 is rescheduled for 12/11/2017 10:00 AM in LV Courtroom 3D before Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 4/18/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
March 31, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER Granting Defendant Mao and Zhang LV, LLC's 38 Motion to Stay. Plaintiff's 34 Motion for Status Conference is Denied as moot. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 3/31/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
February 22, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER Granting 35 Motion to Substitute Attorney. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 02/22/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV)
September 9, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER Granting 28 Stipulation to Stay Case. This stay will expire after the Ninth Circuit issues a mandate in Bourne Valley and the Nevada Supreme Court issues an opinion in Saticoy Bay LLC Series 350 Durango 104. Status Hearing set for 12/16/2016 10:00 AM in LV Courtroom 3D before Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 9/9/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
May 10, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff must file a Certificate of Interested Parties on or before May 16, 2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 05/10/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PNC Bank, National Association v. Mao and Zhang LV LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mao and Zhang LV LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: PNC Bank, National Association
Represented By: Colt B. Dodrill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?