Posey v. Neven et al
Anthony Meritt Posey |
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Dwight Neven |
2:2015cv01482 |
August 4, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Richard F. Boulware |
George Foley |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 50 ORDER that the First Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 18 ) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner is DENIED a certificate of appealability. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondents Motion to Strike Poseys Motion f or Ruling (ECF No. 49 ) is GRANTED, and the Clerk of the Court is ordered to STRIKE the Motion for Ruling (ECF No. 48 ) from the Courts docket. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Clerk of the Court is directed to substitute Jeremy Bean, Ronald Oliver, Julie Williams, and James Scally for Respondent Neven, enter judgment accordingly, and close this case. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 12/12/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TRW) |
Filing 37 ORDER granting 35 Motion to Extend Time; Respondents' answer due 6/19/2019. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 5/13/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM) |
Filing 34 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 24 Motion to Dismiss; Respondents shall file an answer to all claims remaining before the Court within forty-five (45) days of entry of this order and that petitioner may file a reply within forty-five (45) days of service of the answer. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 3/20/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM) |
Filing 30 ORDER granting 29 Motion to Extend Time; Re: 24 Motion to Dismiss. Responses due by 12/19/2018. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 10/19/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM) |
Filing 28 ORDER granting 27 Motion to Extend Time; Re: 24 Motion to Dismiss. Responses due by 10/20/2018. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 8/21/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM) |
Filing 22 ORDER granting 21 Motion to Extend Time; Attorney General of the State of Nevada answer due 8/9/2018; Dwight Neven answer due 8/9/2018. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 6/22/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM) |
Filing 20 ORDER that respondents shall have forty-five (45) days from the date of entry of this order to answer or otherwise respond to the 18 first amended petition. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 5/9/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM) |
Filing 15 ORDER Granting 14 Motion to Extend Time. ( Amended Petition due by 8/10/2017.) Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 5/25/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR) |
Filing 10 ORDER granting 5 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis.; granting 6 Ex Parte Motion to Appoint Counsel.; Federal Public Defender shall have thirty (30) days from the date that this order is entered to undertake direct repr esentation of petitioner or to indicate to the court its inability to represent petitioner in these proceedings. FURTHER ORDERED that respondents' counsel shall enter a notice of appearance within twenty (20) days of entry of this order. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 2/9/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF and pursuant to Order - JM) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.