Ghanem v. ADT Corporation et al
| Nasser Ghanem |
| ADT Corporation, ADT Holdings Inc and ADT LLC of Delaware |
| 2:2015cv01551 |
| August 13, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Carl W. Hoffman |
| Richard F. Boulware |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Property Damage |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
ORDER Granting 36 Stipulated Confidentiality Agreement and Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 10/13/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER denying Defendants' ECF No. 4 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 4/26/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER that 12 Motion to Stay Discovery is GRANTED. Discovery is stayed pending the outcome of the motion to dismiss (ECF No. 4 ). FURTHER ORDERED that if the district judge denies the motion to dismiss, the parties must meet and confer and file a proposed discovery plan and scheduling order within 14 days from the date of the order denying the motion to dismiss. The proposed discovery plan and scheduling order must comply with LR 26-1(e), with discovery deadlines measured from the date of the order on the motion to dismiss. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 3/2/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
