Smith v. Williams et al
| Tarrell M. Smith |
| Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Brian E. Williams |
| 2:2015cv01762 |
| September 14, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Nancy J. Koppe |
| Richard F. Boulware |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
ORDER granting 16 Motion to Dismiss with prejudice. The court will not issue a certificate of appealability. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 7/13/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER granting 11 Motion for scheduling order.; Amended Petition due 90 days from entry of this order., Respondent's Counsel shall enter a notice of appearance 20 days from entry of this order. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 2/9/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF, cc: Added Atty General Counsel - JM)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER that 3 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. Petitioner shall have thirty (30) days from the date that this order is entered to have the filing fee of five dollars ($5.00) sent to the clerk of the court. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 11/13/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
