Duarte-Herrera v. Williams et al
Porfirio Duarte-Herrera |
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Warden Brian Williams |
2:2015cv01843 |
September 24, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Carl W. Hoffman |
Gloria M. Navarro |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 100 ORDER Denying 64 Second Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. The clerk is instructed to substitute William Hutchings for Respondent Brian Williams, enter judgment accordingly, and close this case. A Certificate of Appealability shall not issue. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 1/12/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS) |
Filing 97 ORDER Granting 96 Motion to Extend Time. Petitioner has until 1/13/20, to file a reply in support of 64 the Second Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 12/2/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR) |
Filing 95 ORDER Granting 93 Motion to Extend Time. Respondents have until 10/28/19, to answer the remaining claims of 64 the Second Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 10/29/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR) |
Filing 92 ORDER Granting 91 Motion to Extend Time. Respondents have until 10/25/19, to answer the remaining claims of 64 the Second Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 10/23/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR) |
Filing 90 ORDER Granting 89 Motion to Extend Time. Respondents have until 10/21/19, to answer the remaining claims of 64 the Second Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 9/23/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR) |
Filing 87 ORDER granting 86 Motion to Extend Time. Respondents will have until 9/19/19, to answer the remaining claims of 64 the Second Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 8/3/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR) |
Filing 85 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the stay of this action is lifted and this action is hereby REOPENED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents shall have sixty days to answer the remaining claims of the petition in this case. See Order for further specifications. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 6/5/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR) |
Filing 83 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 75 respondents' motion to dismiss is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is stayed pending exhaustion of the unexhausted claims in petitioner's amended petition. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall administratively close this action, until such time as the Court grants a motion to reopen the matter. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 11/13/2018 (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR) |
Filing 80 ORDER Granting 79 Unopposed Motion to Extend Re: 75 Motion to Dismiss. Responses due by 7/27/2018. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 5/25/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR) |
Filing 74 ORDER Granting 73 Motion to Extend Time. Respondents shall have to and including 5/14/18, within which to file a response to 64 the petitioner's second amended petition. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 5/1/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR) |
Filing 72 ORDER Granting 71 Motion to Extend Time. Respondents shall have up to and including 4/30/18, within which to file a response to 64 the petitioner's second amended petition. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 3/30/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR) |
Filing 70 ORDER Granting 69 Motion to Extend Time. Respondents shall have up to and including 3/29/18, within which to file a response to 64 the petitioner's second amended petition. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 2/14/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR) |
Filing 27 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 11 the motion to stay and abey is DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 24 the motion to withdraw the motion to withdraw is GRANTED. The previously filed motion to withdraw as counsel 18 is hereby WITHDRAWN. Do ws will continue to represent petitioner in this action. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 20 , 22 the pending motions for appointment of counsel are DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner shall have thirty days from the date of this order to either supplement his first amended petition or file a motion to amend. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 11/27/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR) |
Filing 15 ORDER. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that respondents' 14 motion for an extension of time to filea response petitioner's 11 motion for a stay and abeyance is GRANTED. The response shall be filed on or before 4/29/16. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 4/25/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS) |
Filing 13 ORDER Granting 12 Motion to Extend Time. Amended Complaint deadline: 5/26/2016. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 4/20/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS) |
Filing 9 ORDER Granting 8 Motion to Extend Time. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion for an Extension of Time to file the First Amended Petition 8 is GRANTED. The first amended petition shall be filed within sixty (60) days from the date of entry of this order. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 2/10/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS) |
Filing 5 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the Office of the Federal Public Defender is HEREBY RELEASED as counsel for petitioner.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Angela Dows, Esq., is HEREBY APPOINTED to represent the petitioner in this action. Ms. Dows shall have thi rty (30) days from the date of entry of this order to FILE AND SERVE on respondents a notice of appearance indicating her representation of petitioner.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court SHALL ELECTRONICALLY SERVE Ms. Dows with a co py of this order, together with a copy of the petition for writ of habeas corpus and its attachments [1-1].IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner shall have ninety (90) days from the date of entry of this order, to FILE AND SERVE on respondents an amended petition for writ of habeas corpus.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents shall have forty-five (45) days after service of an amended petition within which to answer, or otherwise respond to, the amended petition. IT IS FURTHE R ORDERED that if and when respondents file an answer, petitioner shall have forty-five (45) days after service of the answer to file and serve a reply.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties SHALL SEND courtesy (paper) copies of all exhibi ts to the Reno Division of this Court. Courtesy copies shall be mailed to the Clerk of Court, 400 S. Virginia St., Reno, NV, 89501, and directed to the attention of Staff Attorney on the outside of the mailing address label.IT IS FURTHER ORD ERED that petitioner shall file no further pro se documents and shall proceed by and through appointed counsel.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court SHALL SEND a copy of this order to the CJA Coordinator.Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 11/23/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.