Cranford v. State of Nevada, et al
| Duke F Cranford |
| Nevada Dept of Corrections, State of Nevada and Warden B Stroud |
| 2:2015cv02189 |
| November 18, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Peggy A. Leen |
| Gloria M. Navarro |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
ORDER that the action is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk of Court shall close this case and enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 6/14/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER that the Nevada Office of the Attorney General shall investigate the matter and file a status report informing the court of its findings on or before 1/19/2018. If Plaintiff's death is confirmed the Nevada Office of the Attorney General shall file a suggestion of death on the record on or before 1/19/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 1/5/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 28 Second Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 6/18/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER that the deadline to accomplish service on Defendant Leaks is 7/14/2017. Clerk shall issue summons UNDER SEAL for Defendant Leaks. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 5/16/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF, cc: USM with 11 and 37 - JM)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER Denying without prejudice Plaintiff's 24 Motion to Appoint Counsel and Granting Defendants' 27 Motion for Issuance of Scheduling Order. A separate scheduling order will be issued. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 4/24/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER Granting Plaintiff's 8 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Within 21 days of the date of entry of this order the Attorney General's Office shall file a notice advising the Court and Plaintiff re the n ames of the Defendants for whom it does/does not accept service for. Plaintiff's 17 Motion to Serve Defendants is Denied as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 11/18/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - cc: Finance and NVDOC; copy of this Order and 11 Second Amended Complaint electronically served to the Office of the Attorney General - SLD)
|
|
Filing
6
SCREENING ORDER that a decision on the 4 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is deferred. The Clerk of the Court shall file the Amended Complaint 4 -1. Plaintiff's amended complaint is dismissed without prejudice with leave to amend. The State of Nevada and Nevada Dept of Corrections are dismissed with prejuidce as amendment would be futile. Plaintiff's 2 and 5 Motions for Preliminary Injunction are denied. Second amended complaint deadline: 30 days fr om the date of entry of this order. If Plaintiff fails to file a second amended complaint curing the deficiencies outlined in this order, this action shall be dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 5/12/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - complaint instructions/form, and amended complaint mailed to Plaintiff - SLD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
