Shumpert v. D. Madrid et al
| Drayden D. Shumpert |
| M. Hines and D. Madrid |
| 2:2015cv02273 |
| December 2, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Jennifer A. Dorsey |
| George Foley |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
48
ORDER granting 45 Motion to Lift Stay of Case; ORDER granting 47 Motion to Lift Stay of Case; Defendants have until February 13, 2020, to renew their motion to dismiss. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 1/14/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 33 Shumpert's Motion to Lift Stay is DENIED. This case remains stayed pending final judgment in Nevada v. Shumpert, Case No. C-15-304633-1. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 3/22/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 34 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Video Evidence is denied, without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr. on 2/7/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER Granting 31 Motion to Stay. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is STAYED pending final judgment in Nevada v. Drayden Shumpert, Nevada Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County Nevada, Case number C-15-304633-1. Either party m ay move to lift the stay once Shumpert's criminal case is resolved. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all other pending motions 14 , 27 , 28 are DENIED without prejudice to their refiling within 20 days after the stay is lifted. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 1/11/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 22 Defendants' Motion for Stay of Discovery is granted, in part. The parties may conduct discovery regarding whether Plaintiff exhausted his administrative remedies prior to filing his complaint. However, al l other discovery is stayed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 22 the stay of discovery will automatically lift upon the Courts denial of Defendants Motion to Dismiss in whole or in part. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 10/13/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file his Certificate as to Interested Parties, which fully complies with LR 7.1-1 no later than July 8, 2016. Failure to comply may result in the issuance of an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr. on 06/28/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV)
|
|
Filing
2
ORDER Denying without prejudice 1 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall send Plaintiff the approved form application to proceed in forma pauperis by a prisoner.IT IS FUR THER ORDERED that within 30 days from the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall enter (1) file a fully completed application to proceed in forma pauerpis; or (2) pay the full $400 filing fee.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff does not time ly comply wiht this Order, dismissal of this action may result.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall retain the complaint 1 , but shall not file it at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 12/4/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS) IFP form and instructions mailed to Plaintiff.
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
