Ditech Financial LLC v. Sommerset Park Homeowners Association et al
Ditech Financial LLC |
Alessi & Koenig, LLC, SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC and Sommerset Park Homeowners Association |
2:2016cv01811 |
July 29, 2016 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Cam Ferenbach |
Gloria M. Navarro |
Real Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 125 ORDER Granting 124 Motion to Substitute Attorney. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 2/1/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC) |
Filing 118 ORDER TO RELEASE BOND. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 10/3/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC) |
Filing 117 ORDER Granting 116 Stipulation for Extension of Time Re: 109 Motion for Attorney Fees. Therefore, the parties agree to extend Sommerset's deadline to file a Reply to and including 10/8/2019. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 10/2/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC) |
Filing 111 ORDER Granting 110 Motion to Remove Attorney from Electronic Service List. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 9/12/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC) |
Filing 108 DEFAULT JUDGMENT in favor of SFR and against Borrowers, HFRC, and Allied as to SFR's quiet title/declaratory relief claims. Re: 107 Order on Motion for Default Judgment. Signed by Clerk of Court Debra K. Kempi on 8/27/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC) |
Filing 107 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 100 , 102 , 103 SFR's Motions for Default Judgment, are GRANTED. Default Judgment is GRANTED in favor of SFR and against Borrowers, HFRC, and Allied as to SFR's quiet title/declaratory relief claims. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 8/26/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC) |
Filing 98 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 85 Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment, is GRANTED consistent with the foregoing. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 84 , 86 Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment, are DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 62 HOA's Motion to Dismiss, and 73 Plaintiff's Motion to Strike, are DENIED as MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that in the event SFR seeks default judgment against Borrowers, HFRC, and Allied, SFR shall file a motion for default judgment within twenty-eight (28) days of this Order's issuance. Otherwise, SFR shall file a status report within this deadline apprising the Court as to how it intends to proceed against Borrowers, HFRC, and Allied. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 7/10/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC) |
Filing 97 ORDER granting 64 Motion to Substitute Party. FURTHER ORDERED that The Bank of New York Mellon f/k/a The Bank of New York as Trustee for the Certificateholders of the CWABS, Inc. Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2006-2 is substituted for Ditech Financial LLC f/k/a Green Tree Servicing LLC as the plaintiff in this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 4/9/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Filing 75 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER re 74 Stipulation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 10/17/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Filing 58 ORDER granting 57 Stipulation to Lift Stay. FURTHER ORDERED that 56 Motion to Lift Stay is DENIED as moot. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 8/31/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 8/21/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Filing 50 ORDER OF RECUSAL. This action is referred to the Clerk of Court for random reassignment to another Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 3/29/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Filing 49 ORDER that this case is administratively STAYED pending exhaustion of all appeals of Bourne Valley Court Trust v. Wells Fargo Bank, 832 F.3d 1154 (9th Cir. 2016). Once exhaustion occurs, any party may move to lift the stay. Until that time, all proceedings in this action are stayed. FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions are DENIED without prejudice with leave to refile within twenty-one days after the stay is lifted.FURTHER ORDERED that current occupant SFR Investments Pool 1 , LLC shall care for, preserve, and maintain the Property.FURTHER ORDERED that, beginning on August 24, 2017, the parties must file a joint status report updating the Court on the status of this case every one-hundred and eighty days. Along with t he joint status report, SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC shall submit a statement affirming that all expenses necessary to maintain the property, including but not limited to, timely and full payment of all homeowners association assessments, property ta xes, and property insurance premiums due and owing or past due at any time during the effective period of this Stay are current and up to date.FURTHER ORDERED that this Order does not prevent the parties from continuing to engage in settlement conference negotiations with the assistance of the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 2/24/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Filing 22 ORDER that 11 Motion for Demand for Security of Costs is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff must submit a bond pursuant to this Order in the amount of $500.00 as to Defendant. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 10/31/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.