Mehudar v. Nydam II et al
| Heather Mehudar |
| Rachael Harris, David Nydam II, Doreen Pine and Tiffany Pugh |
| 2:2016cv02196 |
| September 16, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Miranda M. Du |
| George Foley |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
53
ORDER that this action is dismissed with prejudice based on Plaintiff's failure to file an amended complaint in compliance with this Court's April 26, 2017, order ECF No. 47 ; Clerk directed to enter judgment accordingly and close this case. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 06/09/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER granting Defendants' ECF No. 11 Motion to Dismiss; giving Plaintiff 30 days to file an amended complaint; directing Clerk to strike ECF Nos. 4 , 6 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 19 , 20 , 25 , 26 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 39 , 41 , 42 , 45 , 46 , and any accompanying exhibits from the record. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 4/26/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER granting Defendants' ECF No. 37 Second Motion to Continue Deadline. Proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order due within 14 days of entry of order denying Defendants' ECF No. 11 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr. on 1/5/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
