U.S.A. Dawgs, Inc. v. Spilotro Law Group, LLC et al
Plaintiff: U.S.A. Dawgs, Inc.
Defendant: Daniel Spilotro and Spilotro Law Group, LLC
Case Number: 2:2016cv02238
Filed: September 23, 2016
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Andrew P. Gordon
Presiding Judge: Nancy J. Koppe
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 4, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER Granting 42 Stipulation of Dismissal with prejudice. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 9/3/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
August 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that on or before 8/31/18, the parties shall file a status report regarding this case and how it is affected by plaintiff U.S.A. Dawgs, Inc.'s bankruptcy filing. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 8/6/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
January 29, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER Denying 36 , 37 stipulation for a settlement conference and to reopen discovery. Any renewed request shall be filed by 2/12/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 1/29/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
October 10, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER Granting 32 Motion to Extend Time. Dawgs shall perfect service of process on the Defendant no later than 10/17/2017. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 10/10/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
September 26, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 13 , 14 the defendant's motion to quash service and dismiss is GRANTED IN PART. The motion to quash service is granted. The motion to dismiss is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff shall have 14 days from entry of this order to properly serve defendant Spilotro Law Group, LLC. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 9/26/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
August 3, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER Granting 27 Motion to Substitute Attorney. Attorneys Joel Z. Schwarz and Joanna M Myers for U.S.A. Dawgs, Inc. substituted for Attorney Brian John Elliott. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 8/3/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: U.S.A. Dawgs, Inc. v. Spilotro Law Group, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Daniel Spilotro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Spilotro Law Group, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: U.S.A. Dawgs, Inc.
Represented By: Brian John Elliott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?