Douzat et al v. Nevada Restaurant Services, Inc.
Plaintiff: Robert Douzat and Danny Sharpe
Defendant: Nevada Restaurant Services, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2016cv02578
Filed: November 7, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: James C. Mahan
Presiding Judge: George Foley
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 29 Motion to Compel Defendant to Respond to Discovery Requests and Motion to Extend Discovery Deadline and 32 Motion for Protective Order are DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 3/14/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
March 8, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER Granting 40 Stipulation to Vacate Hearing on 29 Motion to Compel and 32 Defendant's Countermotion for Protective Order set for 3/9/18 at 1:00 p.m. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that a status hearing is scheduled for 11:00 AM, 9/5/18, in Courtroom 3D. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 3/8/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
March 7, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 39 MINUTE ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the hearing on 29 the Motion to Compel and Extend Discovery Deadline and 32 Countermotion for Protective Order scheduled for 11:00 AM, 3/9/18 is RESCHEDULED to 1:00 PM, 3/9/18, in Courtroom 3D. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 3/7/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
February 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that a hearing on 29 the Motion to Compel and Extend Discovery Deadline and 32 Countermotion for Protective Order is scheduled for 11:00 AM, 3/9/18, in Courtroom 3D. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the dispositive motion deadline currently set for 2/26/18 is hereby vacated.Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 2/26/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
March 17, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER Granting 18 Stipulation of Dismissal with prejudice as Danny Sharpe's Claim. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 3/17/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Douzat et al v. Nevada Restaurant Services, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Douzat
Represented By: Philip J Trenchak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Danny Sharpe
Represented By: Philip J Trenchak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nevada Restaurant Services, Inc.
Represented By: Lisa A McClane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?