Shelstad v. TGS Aviation Services, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Kieth C. Shelstad
Defendant: TGS Aviation Services, Inc. and United Airlines, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2016cv02671
Filed: November 21, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Kent J. Dawson
Presiding Judge: Carl W. Hoffman
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 69 ORDER that 65 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED with prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court enter JUDGMENT for Defendant and against Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 3/15/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
October 31, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 62 ORDER granting 61 Motion to Withdraw as Counsel for plaintiff Kieth C. Shelstad by Carrie E Hurtik. FURTHER ORDERED that Ms. Hurtik must serve a copy of this order on Mr. Shelstad and must file proof of that service by November 6, 2018. FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of court must update the docket sheet with Mr.Shelstad's last known address. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 10/30/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
July 24, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER Granting 51 Motion to Substitute Attorney. Carrie E. Hurtik is substituted in place and stead of Rachel Ashley Sloane for plaintiff. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 7/24/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
July 10, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDER Granting 48 Motion to Substitute Attorney. Carrie E. Hurtik is substituted in place and stead of Rachel Lynn Shelstad. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 7/10/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
July 5, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 17 Defendant United Airlines' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court enter JUDGMENT for Defendant United Airlines, Inc. and against Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 7/5/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shelstad v. TGS Aviation Services, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kieth C. Shelstad
Represented By: Carrie E Hurtik
Represented By: Rachel Lynn Shelstad
Represented By: Rachel Ashley Sloane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TGS Aviation Services, Inc.
Represented By: Daniel R Watkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United Airlines, Inc.
Represented By: Jody Boquist
Represented By: Crystal J. Herrera
Represented By: Daniel R Watkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?