Patton v. Financial Business and Consumer Solutions, Inc.
| Russell Patton |
| Financial Business and Consumer Solutions, Inc. |
| 2:2016cv02738 |
| November 30, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Carl W. Hoffman |
| James C. Mahan |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
53
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDER, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that 38 Financial Solutions motion for summary judgment be, and the same hereby is GRANTED. The clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close the case. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 7/30/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER Granting 44 Stipulation to Terminate Hearing on 31 Motion for Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 12/4/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER Granting 39 Stipulation to Extend Time Re: 38 Motion for Summary Judgment. Responses due by 11/30/2017. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 11/16/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that 22 defendant Financial Business and Consumer Solutions, Inc.'s motion to dismiss be, and the same hereby is, DENIED. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 7/20/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that 18 plaintiff's motion to amend/correct complaint be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall file, within seven (7) days from the entry of this ord er, an amended complaint identical to that attached to his motion 18 -2. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 14 defendant's motion for summary judgment be, and the same hereby is, DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 5/2/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER Granting 16 Stipulation to Stay Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 4/3/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER Granting 5 Stipulation to Extend Answer to Complaint. See Order for deadlines. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 3/21/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Patton v. Financial Business and Consumer Solutions, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Financial Business and Consumer Solutions, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Russell Patton | |
| Represented By: | Paul R Connaghan |
| Represented By: | Danny Horen |
| Represented By: | Tara D Newberry |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
