Murillo v. Goad et al
Lino Murillo |
Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of The Church of Latter-day Saints and Brendan Michael Goad |
2:2016cv02739 |
November 30, 2016 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Carl W. Hoffman |
Richard F. Boulware |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 50 ORDER that CPB's 25 Motion for Summary Judgmen is Denied. CPB's 26 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is Granted in part and Denied in part. The alternative Motion for Summary Judgment is Denied. Murillo's 33 Motion for Summary Judgment is Denied. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 12/12/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD) |
Filing 46 ORDER. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that 17 Plaintiff's motion to compel is DENIED without prejudice to its reassertion in the proper district. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 10/13/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
Filing 24 ORDER Granting 23 Stipulation for Extension of Time (First Request) re Deadline for Pretrial Disclosures. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 8/16/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD) |
Filing 21 ORDER Granting 20 Stipulation to Take the Deposition of Stan V. Smith, PH.D After 7/31/2017 Discovery Deadline (First Request). Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 7/13/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.