HSBC Bank USA, National Association v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC et al
| HSBC Bank USA, National Association |
| Belcrest Homeowners Association and SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC |
| 2:2016cv02762 |
| December 2, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Nancy J. Koppe |
| Richard F. Boulware |
| Constitutional - State Statute |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
48
DEFAULT JUDGMENT in favor of SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC against Marilu Aguilera. Signed by Clerk of Court Debra K. Kempi on 3/31/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER granting 43 Stipulation of Dismissal with prejudice as to SFR Investments Pool 1 LLC and Lifting Stay; Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 12/12/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER granting 37 Stipulation; Re: 33 Motion for Summary Judgment, 32 Motion for Summary Judgment, Replies due by 12/1/2017. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 11/27/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER denying 21 Proposed Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 3/15/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 3/13/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
