Wortham et al v. Western Mutual Insurance Company
Bobby E Wortham and Sylvia E Wortham |
Western Mutual Insurance Company |
2:2016cv02988 |
December 23, 2016 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Carl W. Hoffman |
James C. Mahan |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 91 ORDER Granting 90 Stipulation of Dismissal. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 7/2/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
Filing 86 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that 26 Western Mutual's motion for partial summary judgment be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 48 plaintiffs' motion requesting the court consider Rule 56(d) relief and an attached declaration be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 3/28/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR) |
Filing 78 ORDER Granting 77 Stipulation to Extend Time Re: 74 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Responses due by 11/20/2017. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 11/16/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR) |
Filing 37 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 19 Plaintiff's motion to amend scheduling order is GRANTED. Discovery in this matters shall close on 9/23/17. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 7/10/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.