Bailey v. Gentry et al
Larry Bailey |
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Jo Gentry |
2:2017cv00866 |
March 22, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Peggy A. Leen |
James C. Mahan |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER that petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus (ECF No. 1 ) is DISMISSED with prejudice as untimely. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. FURTHER ORDERED that the court declines to issue certificate of appealability. FURTH ER ORDERED that the Clerk shall add Adam Paul Laxalt, Attorney General for the State of Nevada, as counsel for respondents, and shall electronically serve upon respondents a copy of this order. No response is necessary. FURTHER ORDERED that 2 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 12/12/2017.(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Filing 7 ORDER that, within thirty (30) days of entry of this order, petitioner shall show cause in writing why the petition should not be dismissed with prejudice as time-barred. No extension of time will be granted to respond to this order except in the most compelling of circumstances. FURTHER ORDERED that 3 Motion to Appoint Counsel is DENIED. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 4/6/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.