Guardado v. State of Nevada Ex Rel et al
| Ernest Jord Guardado |
| Quentin Bryne, Tara Carpenter, Bill Connett, James Dzurenda, C/O Gouveia, Dale Harkreader, Nevada Department of Corrections, Valaree Olivas, William Sandy, State of Nevada Ex Rel and G. Waters |
| 2:2017cv00879 |
| March 27, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Peggy A. Leen |
| James C. Mahan |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
107
ORDER Granting 58 Motion for Summary Judgment, Denying 63 Motion to Stay Summary Judgment and Granting 98 Motion to Lift Stay of Case. The clerk shall enter judgment and close this case. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 9/23/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)
|
|
Filing
106
ORDER Denying 96 Motion for Sanctions. Further Ordered that defendants have satisfied the 104 Order to Show Cause. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 9/21/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)
|
|
Filing
102
ORDER Defendants must supplement their response by 8/30/2021 and detail what they have done to comply with this Courts 94 Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 8/16/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)
|
|
Filing
94
ORDER Granting in part and Denying in part 85 Motion for relief regarding production of discovery, Defendants have 20 days from today's order to comply. The Court Further Denies the 88 Motion for Appointment of Counsel and Grants the 92 Motion requesting submission of exhibits. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 4/1/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)
|
|
Filing
81
ORDER denying 74 Objection/Appeal Magistrate Judge Order and Affirming 71 Order on Motion for Appointment of Counsel. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 11/12/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)
|
|
Filing
72
ORDER: The Clerk is directed to file the First Amended Complaint located at [41-1]. The Clerk shall also supply to plaintiff a USM-285 form (attached herein for distribution through law library) On which, the Plaintiff must fill in defendant Quentin Bryne's last-known address, and must return the form no later than 11/3/2020. The Clerk will then issue a summons, under seal, to Quentin Bryne, and forward the Summons, USM-285, a copy of this order and the complaint to the USMS for service. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 10/14/2020. (Attachments: # 1 USM 285)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER granting 49 MOTION to Extend Time (First Request) re 34 Scheduling Order. Motions due by 9/7/2020. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 6/5/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER granting 42 MOTION for Court to Order Copies of 41 Motion to Amend/Correct. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 5/1/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF with a copy of 41 to P via USPS this date - DRS)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 29 Guardado's motion for issuance of summons is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 25 Guardado's motion to compel information is DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 30 Guardado's motion for a r uling on his motion for issuance of summons is DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 31 Guardado's motion for a scheduling order is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline for service under Rule 4(m) is reset: service must be complete within 90 days from the date that this order is entered. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court send Guardado three blank copies of form USM-285. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court issue summonses, under seal, to Bruce Ha rkreader, Byrne, and Sandie using the addresses that were filed under seal at ECF Nos. 23 & 26. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 2/7/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - Encl.: 3 USM 285 forms; cc: USM w/ ECF nos. 23 & 26 - ADR)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER Granting Plaintiff's 11 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff shall not be required to pay an initial installment of the filing fee. Service must be perfected within 90 days from the date of this order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Within 21 days of the date of entry of this order the Attorney General's Office shall file a notice advising the Court and Plaintiff re whom it does/does not accept service for. This case is no longer stayed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 5/15/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - cc: Finance; copy mailed to NDOC; electronically served AG this Order and 14 Amended Complaint - SLD)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER that Plaintiff's 6 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is Denied without prejudice to file a new application. Plaintiff's 7 Motion to Withdraw Motion is Granted. The 5 Motion for Extension of Time is Denied as moot. Within 30 days from the date of this order Plaintiff shall either: (1) file a fully complete application to proceed in forma pauperis or (2) pay the full $400 fee for filing a civil action. The Clerk of the Court shall retain the 1 -1 complaint but not file it at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 4/26/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - IFP instructions/form mailed to Plaintiff - SLD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
