Balderas-Nunez v. Williams et al
| Jonathan Balderas-Nunez |
| Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Brian Williams |
| 2:2017cv00988 |
| April 5, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Cam Ferenbach |
| Andrew P. Gordon |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
3
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 1 the application to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED and that this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to the filing of a new petition in a new action with a properly completed pauper application with all new and complete financial attachments. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall send petitioner two copies each of an application form to proceed in forma pauperis for incarcerated persons and a noncapital Section 2254 habeas petition form, one copy of the instructions for each form, and a copy of the papers that he submitted in this action. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner may file a new petition and in forma pauperis application in a new action, but he may not file further d ocuments in this action. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 5/15/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
