Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC et al
| Deutsche Bank National Trust Company |
| Alessi & Koenig, LLC, Lamplight Square @ Coronado Ranch Homeowners' Association, Lamplight Square @ Coronado Ranch, LLC and SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC |
| 2:2017cv01504 |
| May 26, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Carl W. Hoffman |
| Richard F. Boulware |
| Constitutional - State Statute |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
48
ORDER that the stay in this case is LIFTED. IT IF FURTHER ORDERED that SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC's 41 Renewed Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 41) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case will be subject to an expedited discovery schedule of 60 days. The parties shall submit a proposed joint discovery plan scheduling order by April 12, 2019. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 3/31/2019.(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - BEL)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER Granting SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC's 16 Motion for Demand for Security of Costs. Plaintiff shall deposit $500.00 with the Clerk of Court within 30 days and that the proceedings be stayed until such cost bond is posted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 8/10/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
