Christian v. Sheriff et al
| Eric Christian |
| Christopher Hoye, Sheriff, US Marshall Service and United States of America |
| 2:2017cv01518 |
| May 26, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Carl W. Hoffman |
| James C. Mahan |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
2
ORDER. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petitioner is denied a certificate of appealability. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall send to petitioner, along w ith a copy of this order, two copies of the form for a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, two copies of the application to proceed in forma pauperis for prisoners, and a copy of any available instructions regarding both forms. IT IS FURTHER ORD ERED that petitioner may file a habeas corpus petition (on a correct form and fully completed), along with payment of the filing fee or an application to proceed in forma pauperis, to initiate a new habeas corpus action. The Court will accept no further filings in this case. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 5/31/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
