Federal National Mortgage Association v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC et al
| Federal National Mortgage Association |
| SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC and Southern Highlands Community Association |
| 2:2017cv01750 |
| June 26, 2017 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Andrew P. Gordon |
| Peggy A. Leen |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
122
ORDER granting ECF No. 121 Stipulation of Dismissal as to Southern Highlands Community Association. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 7/17/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LW)
|
|
Filing
118
ORDER Denying 103 Motion for Rule 56(d) Relief; Granting 109 Motion for Reconsideration; Granting 99 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment; Denying 101 Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment; and Setting Deadline for Stipulation of Dismissal. See Order for details/deadlines. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 6/11/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
|
|
Filing
114
ORDER Granting 113 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 109 Motion for Reconsideration (First Request). Replies due by 4/8/2020. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 3/20/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
|
|
Filing
94
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 71 plaintiff Federal National Mortgage Association's motion for summary judgment is DENIED.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 77 defendant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC's motion for Rule 56(d) relief is GRANTED.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 87 defendant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED in part. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 7/22/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER Granting 73 , 74 Stipulations to Extend Time Re: 71 Motion for Summary Judgment, 72 Motion to Stay Discovery. Responses due by 1/3/2019. Replies due by 2/1/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 12/28/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 42 defendant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC's motion for reconsideration is GRANTED. Counts one through four of 32 the amended complaint are dismissed with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 37 the motion for summary judgment and 54 motion for relief under Rule 56(d) are DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 10/22/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER Granting 58 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 42 Motion for Reconsideration (First Request). Replies due by 4/30/2018. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 4/30/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff/counter-defendant Federal National Mortgage Association's 38 Motion to Stay Discovery is GRANTED. SFR's 44 Countermotion to Stay is GRANTED. See Order for details/deadlines. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 4/19/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER Granting 46 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 37 Motion for Summary Judgment, 38 Motion to Stay Discovery, and 42 Motion for Reconsideration (First Request). See Order for deadlines. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 4/2/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
