Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. The Springs at Centennial Ranch Homeowners Association et al
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |
| SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC and The Springs at Centennial Ranch Homeowners Association |
| 2:2017cv01887 |
| July 10, 2017 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Miranda M. Du |
| Nancy J. Koppe |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
128
ORDER. It is therefore ordered that the property located at 921 Oceanwood Ave., N. Las Vegas, NV 89086, APN 124-23-411-010, remains encumbered by the Deed of Trust recorded in the Clark County Recorders Office as Instrument Number 20050124-0004216 ( again, the "DOT"). See Order for details. It is further ordered that Wells Fargo's motion to remove Darren T. Brenner, Esq., Jamie K, Combs, and Rex D. Garner, from the electronic service list (ECF No. 126 ) is granted. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close this case. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 12/12/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ALZ)
|
|
Filing
124
ORDER Granting 123 Stipulation for Extension of Time to File Joint Status Report. Joint Status Report due by 12/11/2023. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 12/5/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ALZ)
|
|
Filing
106
ORDER denying ECF No. 100 Wells Fargo's motion to alter or amend the Court's Order and Final Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 6/9/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LW)
|
|
Filing
103
ORDER granting ECF No. 102 Stipulation. Response to ECF No. 100 Motion to Amend/Correct due by April 8, 2020. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 4/6/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AB)
|
|
Filing
93
ORDERED that SFR's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 79 ) is GRANTED; the Association's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 78 ) is GRANTED; Wells Fargo's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 80 ) is DENIED; and SFR's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 61 ) is DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the nonjudicial foreclosure sale conducted on July 11, 2012 extinguished all junior interests in the Property, including the deed of trust recorded as Instrument No. 20050118-0001108. (See pdf order for further details). Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 2/24/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LW)
|
|
Filing
77
ORDER granting ECF No. 76 Motion to Remove Attorney Vetana Lay from Electronic Service List for Bank of America, N.A. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 1/22/2019. (Attorney Vatana Lay terminated.) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER Regarding Briefing Schedule For Discovery Motions. The Court therefore ORDERS that, absent leave for an extension being granted, the responses to a discovery motion shall be filed within 4 days of the service of that motion and any reply shall be filed within 2 days of the service of the response. See order for further details and instructions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 9/11/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER granting ECF No. 38 Stipulation to Extend Time re brief of ECF No. 33 Motion for Protective Order. Responses due by 11/22/2017. Replies due by 11/29/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 11/27/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
