Isaharov v. Berryhill
Plaintiff: Tanya Lulu Isaharov
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Case Number: 2:2017cv01958
Filed: July 18, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Andrew P. Gordon
Presiding Judge: George Foley
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER that Magistrate Judge Cobb's report and recommendation (ECF No. 32 ) is accepted; plaintiff Tanya Isaharov's motion to remand (ECF No. 15 ) is DENIED; defendant Nancy Berryhill's motion to affirm (ECF No. 21 ) is GRANTED; Clerk directed to enter judgment in favor of defendant Nancy Berryhill and against plaintiff Tanya Isaharov. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 2/10/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LW)
January 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER Granting 25 Motion to Amend. Attorneys Shea L Bond and Chantal Jenkins terminated. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 1/17/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
January 18, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER Granting 19 Motion to Extend Time Re: 15 Motion to Remand to Agency. Responses due by 2/21/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 1/18/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
December 19, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER Granting 17 Motion to Extend Time Re: 15 Motion to Remand to Agency. Responses due by 1/22/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 12/19/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
August 10, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 1 Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is granted. Plaintiff shall not be required to pre-pay the full filing fee of four hundred dollars ($400.00). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall file 1 -1 the Complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall serve the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration by sending a copy of summons and Complaint by certified mail. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED t hat the Clerk of the Court shall issue summons to the United States Attorney for the District of Nevada, and deliver the summons and Complaint to the U.S. Marshal for service. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants shall have sixty (60) days from the date of service to file their answer or responsive pleading to Plaintiff's Complaint in this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 8/10/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - cc: USM - ADR)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Isaharov v. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tanya Lulu Isaharov
Represented By: Joshua R Harris
Represented By: Richard A Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?