Federal National Mortgage Association v. BFP Investments 4 LLC
Plaintiff: Federal National Mortgage Association
Defendant: BFP Investments 4 LLC
Case Number: 2:2017cv02033
Filed: July 26, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Cam Ferenbach
Presiding Judge: James C. Mahan
Nature of Suit: Real Property: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 60 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that 46 defendant's motion for reconsideration be, and the same hereby is, DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 45 plaintiff's motion for judgment be, and the same hereby is, GRANTE D. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall prepare and submit a proposed judgment consistent with the foregoing within thirty (30) days of the date of this order. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 3/13/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
July 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 58 ORDER Granting 57 Stipulation to Extend Time Re: 46 Motion for Reconsideration. Replies due by 7/13/2018. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 7/9/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
June 22, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 56 ORDER granting 55 Stipulation to Extend Time to Reply re: 46 Motion for Reconsideration. Replies due by 7/6/2018. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 6/22/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
June 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER Granting 49 Stipulation to Extend Time Re: 45 Motion for Judgment. Replies due by 6/15/2018. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 6/12/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
April 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that 28 plaintiff's motion for summary judgment be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 12 defendant's motion to dismiss be, and the same hereby is, DENIED . IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 39 defendant's motion for summary judgment, be, and the same hereby is, DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 17 plaintiff's motion to schedule summary judgment briefing be, and the same hereby is, DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 4/27/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
January 25, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER Granting 36 Stipulation to Extend Time Re: 28 Motion for Summary Judgment. Responses due by 1/26/2018. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 1/25/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
January 18, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER Granting 33 Stipulation to Extend Time Re: 28 Motion for Summary Judgment. Responses due by 1/24/2018. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 1/18/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
January 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER granting 30 Stipulation; Re: 16 Motion to Stay Discovery. Motion Hearing reset for 1/12/2018 at 03:00 PM in LV Courtroom 3D before Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 1/11/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
December 15, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER Granting 21 Stipulation for Extension of Time Re: 16 Motion to Stay Discovery and 17 Motion to Schedule Summary Judgment Briefing. Replies due by 12/15/2017. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 12/15/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
December 8, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 20 Stipulation and Order to Extend Briefing Schedule on the Motion to Stay All Discovery is GRANTED. Any opposition to 16 the Motion to Stay must be filed on or before 12/8/2017. Any reply in support of 16 the Motion to Stay must be filed on or before 12/15/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 12/8/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
November 9, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER Denying 14 Motion to Stay Discovery without prejudice to re-file separate motions for each form of requested relief. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 11/9/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
October 18, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that 7 defendant's demand for security costs be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall post a cost bond in the amount of $500.00 or make a cash deposit of $500.00 as to defendant within seven (7) days of the entry of this order. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 10/18/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Federal National Mortgage Association v. BFP Investments 4 LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BFP Investments 4 LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Federal National Mortgage Association
Represented By: Jory C. Garabedian
Represented By: Laurel I. Handley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?