JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC et al
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. |
Newport Cove III Owners Association, SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC and Tsan-Li Yueh Sun |
2:2017cv02035 |
July 26, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Cam Ferenbach |
Richard F. Boulware |
Constitutional - State Statute |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 47 ORDER Granting 46 Stipulation of Dismissal and Lift Stay. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 12/11/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
Filing 45 ORDER. For reasons of judicial economy and to avoid inconsistent decisions, the Court will not consider any further motions until the parties have had the opportunity to receive and address the Nevada Supreme Court's opinion. IT IS FURTHER ORDE RED that 32 Defendant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all other pending motions are DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 7/13/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
Filing 23 ORDER Granting 17 Stipulation re 13 Motion for Demand for Security of Costs. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 13 SFR's Demand for Security of Costs is DENIED as MOOT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 10/27/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - cc: Finance - MR) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.