Patterson v. Gentry et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|December 14, 2017
ORDER that 7 Motion for Leave to File a First Amended Petition is GRANTED. The clerk of the court shall file the first amended petition,which currently is at ECF No. 7-1. FURTHER ORDERED that 8 Motion to File a second amended petition is GRANTED. Petitioner will have ninety (90) days from the date of entry of this order to file and serve a second amended petition. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 12/14/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|October 25, 2017
ORDER that 2 Ex Parte Motion to Appoint Counsel is DENIED as moot. FURTHER ORDERED that 4 Ex Parte Motion for Appointment of Counsel is GRANTED. The Federal Public Defender is appointed to represent petitioner. Petitioner shall have sixty (60 ) days from the date of entry of this order to file an amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The clerk shall add Adam Paul Laxalt, Attorney General for the State of Nevada, as counsel for respondents and shall electronically serve both the At torney General of the State of Nevada and the Federal Public Defender a copy of the petition (ECF No. 1) and a copy of this order. FURTHER ORDERED that respondents counsel shall enter a notice of appearance within twenty (20) days of entry of this order, but respondents need not file any other response to this order. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 10/25/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?