Smith v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Nevada District Court Smith v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department

Smith v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department

Plaintiff:	Marty Smith
Defendant:	Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department
Case Number:	2:2017cv02503
Filed:	September 25, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office:	Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge:	Kent J. Dawson
Presiding Judge:	Cam Ferenbach
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 4, 2017	Filing 7 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 5 the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation entered 11/13/17, are ADOPTED and AFFIRMED.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court enter JUDGMENT for Defendant and against Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 12/4/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
October 12, 2017	Filing 3 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 1 , 1 -1 Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall file 1 -2 the Complaint.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 1 -2 Plaintiff's complaint is D ISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff have until 11/6/17 to file an Amended Complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if an Amended Complaint is later filed, the Clerk of the Court is directed NOT to issue summons on the Amended Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 10/4/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 4, 2017

Filing 7 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 5 the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation entered 11/13/17, are ADOPTED and AFFIRMED.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court enter JUDGMENT for Defendant and against Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 12/4/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

October 12, 2017

Filing 3 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 1 , 1 -1 Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall file 1 -2 the Complaint.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 1 -2 Plaintiff's complaint is D ISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff have until 11/6/17 to file an Amended Complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if an Amended Complaint is later filed, the Clerk of the Court is directed NOT to issue summons on the Amended Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 10/4/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marty Smith
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?