IGT v. Scrappy Elegant Gaming, LLC et al
IGT |
Jamie Leigh Klingler, Darryl Rosenblatt and Scrappy Elegant Gaming, LLC |
2:2017cv02532 |
September 29, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Richard F. Boulware |
George Foley |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 54 ORDER granting 53 Stipulation of Dismissal Without Prejudice; Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 2/27/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM) |
Filing 51 ORDER granting 50 Stipulation to Stay All Proceedings and Deadlines; Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 2/8/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM) |
Filing 49 ORDER denying 47 Motion to Extend Time; Defendants' answer due 2/23/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 2/7/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM) |
Filing 44 ORDER granting 43 Stipulation; Defendants' answer due 2/6/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 1/23/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM) |
Filing 38 ORDER granting 37 Ex Parte Motion; Status Conference reset for 1/18/2018 at 09:30 AM in LV Courtroom 3A before Magistrate Judge George Foley Jr. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 12/7/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.