Newton v. State of Nevada et al
Shelly J Newton |
Michael G. Giles, Joseph Lombardo, State of Nevada and Steven B. Wolfson |
2:2017cv02894 |
November 17, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Kent J. Dawson |
George Foley |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER that this action shall be DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of exhaustion and further under the Younger abstention doctrine. FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED. The Clerk of Court shall enter final judgment accordingly, dismissing this action without prejudice. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 12/19/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD) |
Filing 4 ORDER Granting Petitioner's 1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Petitioner shall not be required to pay the filing fee. The Clerk of Court shall file the Petition and within 30 days of entry of this order Petitione r shall SHOW CAUSE in writing why the federal petition should not be dismissed without prejudice. The State of Nevada shall be DISMISSED as a Respondent and Petitioner has 30 days to file an Amended Petition naming the Sheriff as a Respondent. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 11/21/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - two 2241 Petitions and two copies of 5 Petition mailed to Petitioner - SLD) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.