JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC et al
| JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. |
| Jennifer C Clarich, Inspirada Community Association, Ronald A Peterson and SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC |
| 2:2018cv00553 |
| March 27, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Nancy J. Koppe |
| Richard F. Boulware |
| Constitutional - State Statute |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
AMENDED ORDER Denying 26 Motion for Return of Surety. The orders granting the motion at Docket Nos. 28 and 29 are hereby VACATED in light of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 3/27/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER. The motion for return of cost bond 26 is GRANTED as unopposed. Local Rule 7-2(d). Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 3/26/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER granting 17 Stipulation to Stay Litigation and Discovery; Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 6/21/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER Granting 11 Motion for Demand for Security of Costs. A cost bond shall be posted within seven days of the issuance of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 5/21/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
