Nosik v. All Bright Family Dentistry, LLC
Yvonne Nosik |
All Bright Family Dentistry, LLC |
2:2018cv00972 |
May 27, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Peggy A. Leen |
Richard F. Boulware |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex) |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 89 ORDER Granting 88 Stipulation for Extension of Time (First Request) re 87 Minute Order. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 9/15/2022. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 9/6/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - YAW) |
Filing 75 ORDER. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 68 ) is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part. The motion is DENIED as to Plaintiff's first claim for Title VII hostile work environment. The motion is GR ANTED as to Plaintiff's second and third claims for Title VII quid pro quo sexual harassment and retaliation. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Order (ECF No. 71 ) is DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff 9;s Motion to Withdraw as Counsel of Record (ECF No. 73 ) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's counsel (Nisce) shall appear at the pretrial conference. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall submit a proposed Joint Pretrial Order to the Court by 4/25/2022; a pretrial videoconference is scheduled for 5/18/2022 at 10 a.m. Plaintiff is ordered to appear along with Nisce. The Court will issue the instructions regarding appearance by videoconference. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 3/29/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - YAW) |
Filing 59 ORDER Granting 58 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 55 Order (First Request). Joint Status Report and Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 9/25/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 9/21/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
Filing 55 ORDER denying 51 Motion to Enforce; Joint Status Report and Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 9/12/2020. The Clerk of Court must reassign this case to another magistrate judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 8/12/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM) |
Filing 31 ORDER granting 30 Motion to Continue; Re: 22 Motion for Protective Order. Motion Hearing reset for 3/15/2019 at 03:00 PM in LV Courtroom 7C before Judge Richard F. Boulware II. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 3/7/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Nosik v. All Bright Family Dentistry, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: All Bright Family Dentistry, LLC | |
Represented By: | Nannina L. Angioni |
Represented By: | Katz Law Group |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Yvonne Nosik | |
Represented By: | Michael P. Balaban |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.